On American Legislative Exchange Council task forces,
corporate lobbyists and special interests vote as equals with elected
representatives on templates to change our laws, behind closed doors with no
press or public allowed to see the votes or deliberations. ALEC’s model
legislation harms women and families in numerous ways, including proposals that
would roll back no fault divorce laws, limit the
regulation of day care centers, make it more difficult for impoverished
children to receive the benefits of welfare, limit regulation of toxic and
hazardous substances that adversely affect children’s health even more so than
adults, bar lawsuits for injuries due to recalled drugs despite the spate of
recalls of medicine used by children and young adults, and, among other things,
outsource to for-profit companies the collection of child support.
Regulating Marriage and Child Care
·
ALEC’s
“Marriage Contract Act” would roll back the clock by decades
to the era when a wife or husband had to prove fault, such as adultery or
impotence, in order to dissolve a marriage contract. The bill rejects the concept of “no-fault” divorce, which
allows incompatible spouses to dissolve a marriage without claiming the failure
was the other’s fault. The bill also specifies that a marriage contract is only
between a man and a woman.
·
ALEC’s
“Neighborhood Child Care Center Act” exempts entities responsible for
providing day care for infants and children from complying with any state
regulations other than those regarding fire/safety and health/sanitation if the
day care center receives no state or federal funds; such provisions may put
more kids at risk of injury from untrained or poorly trained day care workers
or from other conditions that would otherwise have been regulated.
Limiting Access to Family Benefits and Relief
Programs
·
ALEC’s
“Proof of Custody Act” requires that a parent have sole
custody to obtain benefits to help care for a child, unless both parents with
joint custody apply for benefits for the child. The bill echoes demands of an
anti-welfare men’s group, which claimed the bill would prevent welfare fraud. It denies access to welfare benefits to
children when parents have joint custody rights unless both parents apply for
benefits and are jointly eligible, without any exceptions for joint custody
situations where a parent is not providing required child support, is uncooperative,
or not themselves eligible for welfare benefits.
·
ALEC’s
“Privatization of Child Support
Enforcement Services”
allows a state to privatize the administration, delivery, and/or management of
child support enforcement services, injecting a profit motive into the
management of child support with no compelling proof that outsourcing such
services to a monopoly business with no competition will improve child support
collection.
·
ALEC’s
“Study of Welfare Benefits of Families in the
AFDC Program Act”
mandates a study to calculate the total value of benefits provided to poor
families, which are often single parent households. Included in the study would
be programs such as low-income energy assistance to prevent families from
freezing to death, school breakfast and lunch programs that help ensure that
children in poverty have nutrition essential to help them concentrate and learn
in school, Head Start programs that help prepare low income children for
school, and “Women, Infants, and Children” (WIC) benefits that help ensure that
babies born in poverty have access to nutrition. The likely aim of the study is
to make it easier for opponents of these programs to argue for their elimination.
Endangering Children’s Health
·
ALEC
legislation such as the Voluntary Childhood Lead Exposure Control Act,
the Private Property Protection Act, the Groundwater Protection Act, and the Resolution to Retain State Authority over Coal Ash as Non-Hazardous
Waste Act impose disproportionate burdens on children and pregnant
women who are particularly vulnerable to environmental toxins. When these bills are enacted, the resulting
increases in pollution exposure and ingestion can lead to premature births,
birth defects, childhood asthma, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and countless
other health problems.
Imposing in Women’s Health
·
ALEC’s
“Parental Consent For Abortion Act” requires written parental consent for
a young woman under 18 to exercise her right preserve her privacy, control her
destiny, and terminate a pregnancy. If a young woman does not seek or is denied
parental consent, she would have to navigate the judicial system to petition a
court to waive the requirement. The bill also makes it a crime for a doctor to
perform an abortion at the young woman’s request, without parental consent or a
judicial override.
·
ALEC’s
“Guide to Repeal Obamacare,” which would repeal the Affordable
Care Act (ACA), and numerous other ALEC “model” bills on Medicaid (i.e. “Resolution on Federal Medicaid and
Welfare Block Grants”) would
adversely affect women, including:
o
Insurance
companies will be free to charge women more than men and deny coverage to
children and adults with preexisting conditions. The ACA would stop this.
o Pregnant women in some states would no
longer receive full Medicaid benefits because some ALEC provisions would not allow states to provide more
benefits than the federal government minimally provides. Enacting such bills may
leave pregnant women without access to important medical attention during
pregnancy.
·
ALEC’s “Drug Liability Act” and “Punitive Damages Standards Act” adversely
impact women and children. The
Drug Liability Act bars American families from suing a drug company if medicine
kills or injures their child, spouse, or parent if the FDA approved the
drug—even though numerous dangerous drugs have been approved by the FDA only to
be recalled and many drugs are not adequately tested on sub-populations such as
children or women of different ages.
Similarly, the limits on punitive damages act would limit the power of a
jury to punish a corporation whose actions or neglect were egregious, and by
limiting punitive damages to a multiple of compensatory damages would
undervalue to lives of children and women, who may have little or no projected
lost income to compensate but whose loss is enormously devastating.
Creating a “Commission on Men”
·
ALEC’s
“Act relating to the creation and
operation of the Commission on Men” would
create a new taxpayer-funded entity to promote “paternal influence” and male
family involvement, as well as examine some men’s health issues. The bill was
sought by men’s rights groups as a way to promote their political and
ideological agenda.
Pushing Laws That Favor Corporations and the Wealthiest over Working
Families
·
ALEC promotes austere economic measures
that disadvantage working families while favoring rich corporations and
individuals: bills include the Capital
Gains Tax Elimination Act, Resolution
Urging Congress to Permanently Extend the Bush Tax Cuts,
and A
memorial to the Congress of the United States, urging Congress to cut the
federal corporate tax rate. These and other bills make it harder
to raise revenue to provide needed public services for families.
No comments:
Post a Comment